Subject: Re: Update on LRM Revisions
From: Paul J. Menchini (mench@mench.com)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 13:11:57 PDT
Bhasker wrote:
> Couple of points:
> 1. I dont think we should advertise the 2000 edition. It will only
> confuse users.
This edition is the first to contain the SVWG work.
> 2. Why are we having a recirculation for editorial changes, that also,
> IEEE editorial changes? Do the editorial changes reflect some
> technical changes as well?
The editorial changes were requested to be added to the recirculation
we're doing to handle the ballot responses.
Paul
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 13:16:23 PDT