Subject: Re: Update on LRM Revisions
From: J. Bhasker (jbhasker@cadence.com)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 07:10:02 PDT
Steve:
Couple of points:
1. I dont think we should advertise the 2000 edition. It will only confuse
users.
2. Why are we having a recirculation for editorial changes, that also, IEEE
editorial
changes? Do the editorial changes reflect some technical changes as well?
- bhasker
At 03:42 PM 9/26/2001 -0600, Stephen Bailey wrote:
>I would like to report that I received my copy of IEEE Std 1076, 2000
>Edition last week. (This is the version that incorporates the 1076a, Shared
>Variables work.) Although we suggested it wasn't worth the time and effort
>to publish this edition as 1076-2000 was coming out shortly, they published
>it anyway.
>
>I have sent off to the IEEE updated copies of 1076-2000/D5 for distribution
>with the ballot re-circulation. "Hey," you ask, "didn't you already do
>that?" Well, yes. But the editorial review found a couple of things that
>they wanted changed so Paul did so and I finally got time to print them out
>this week and send them to the IEEE.
>
>How long will it take the IEEE to send out the re-circ ballot? Your guess
>is as good as mine. However, when I receive mine or hear any information
>from the IEEE, I will let you know.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Stephen Bailey
>Staff Corporate Applications Engineer, VHDL Simulation
>Synopsys Inc.
>sbailey@synopsys.com
>303-588-2001 (voice/mobile)
>650-584-4893 (voice)
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
J. Bhasker
Cadence Design Systems
7535 Windsor Drive, Suite A200, Allentown, PA 18195
610.398.6312, 610.530.7985 (fax), jbhasker@cadence.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 07:26:16 PDT