Subject: Re: 1076-2000
From: Stephen Bailey (sbailey@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 12:13:58 PDT
You've raised a good reason (WRT RevCom) for keeping Appendix D clean.
However, 1076-2000 Edition is a "pull" publication. Perhaps we can publish
just the Appendix D from 1076-2000 Edition on the web? What do you think?
-Steve Bailey
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul J. Menchini <mench@mench.com>
To: <stds-vasg@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: 1076-2000
>
> Bhasker,
>
> > I noticed that the draft P1076-2000-D3 talks about changes from
> > 1076a-2000, as compared to 1076-1993. In fact, Annex D has a title
> > to this effect.
>
> > Given the fact that 1076a never got published, it would be confusing
> > to readers to base this standard on an unpublished document.
>
> Actually, it is in the process of being published as we speak. Also,
> one of the requirements for getting 1076a approved was to base the
> next release of 1076 on 1076a.
>
> > I think all changes marked in this document, including Annex D, must
> > be with respect to 1076-1993.
>
> No, they're with respect to 1076a-2000.
>
> > I agree that in the final standard the change bars/corrections will
> > not show up. But at least Annex D needs to be corrected.
>
> Not a good idea, IMHO. RevCom will not then be aware of the fact that
> it was based on 1076a and might therefore reject it out of hand.
>
> Paul
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 25 2000 - 12:22:46 PDT