Re: 1076-2000


Subject: Re: 1076-2000
From: Paul J. Menchini (mench@mench.com)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 11:55:50 PDT


Bhasker,

> I noticed that the draft P1076-2000-D3 talks about changes from
> 1076a-2000, as compared to 1076-1993. In fact, Annex D has a title
> to this effect.

> Given the fact that 1076a never got published, it would be confusing
> to readers to base this standard on an unpublished document.

Actually, it is in the process of being published as we speak. Also,
one of the requirements for getting 1076a approved was to base the
next release of 1076 on 1076a.

> I think all changes marked in this document, including Annex D, must
> be with respect to 1076-1993.

No, they're with respect to 1076a-2000.

> I agree that in the final standard the change bars/corrections will
> not show up. But at least Annex D needs to be corrected.

Not a good idea, IMHO. RevCom will not then be aware of the fact that
it was based on 1076a and might therefore reject it out of hand.

Paul



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 25 2000 - 12:02:04 PDT