[Resent due to addressing error. My apologies if you receive multiple
copies.]
>> I agree with you entirely. We already have 1076-1987 and
>> 1076-1993, and will be adding 1076-1999 ( or will it be 2000 when we
>> get there ? ) Having 1076a in addition produces additional confusion
>> which we have the opportunity to avoid. I vote to drop 1076a and
>> roll the changes into 1076-1999. In New Orleans I was one of the
>> supporters of this option. I will also feel better about these
>> changes if they are balloted approved by the whole 1076-1999
>> balloting community, rather than the smaller 1076a list.
I don't see how you can compare the sizes of the 1076a balloting list
vs. the 1076-1999 list when the latter does not exist.
Paul
-- Paul Menchini | mench@mench.com |"The last thing I want to do is OrCAD | www.orcad.com | spread fear, uncertainty and P.O. Box 71767 | 919-479-1670[v] | doubt in the users' minds." Durham, NC 27722-1767 | 919-479-1671[f] | --Don Jones, MS's Y2K Product Mgr